USC
W-L: ( 4- 0) PR = 94.5913Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 829 H San Jose St ( 2- 1, 81.2) 42- 26 904 H Fresno St ( 1- 1, 81.2) 39- 0 912 H Louisiana ( 2- 1, 83.5) 49- 30 919 A Rutgers ( 0- 3, 79.6) 42- 35 926 H Oregon ( 2- 1, 85.7) 1003 H Washington ( 3- 0, 87.8) 1010 A Penn State ( 3- 0, 96.8) 1024 A Wisconsin ( 2- 1, 86.3) 1031 H Ohio State ( 2- 1, 92.5) 1114 A Indiana ( 3- 0, 93.6) 1121 H Maryland ( 2- 1, 90.4) 1128 A UCLA ( 2- 0, 94.8)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
829 H San Jose St 42-26 16 14 0.57
904 H Fresno St 39- 0 39 14 0.58
912 H Louisiana 49-30 19 12 + 2.93
919 A Rutgers 42-35 7 14 --- -6.97
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 919 A Rutgers 42-35 7 14 --- -6.97 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 912 H Louisiana 49-30 19 12 + 2.93 |
USC Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Col | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| California | USC | USC | ||
| Clemson | USC | USC | ||
| Duke | Duke | Duke | ||
| Florida St | USC | USC | ||
| Georgia Tech | USC | USC | ||
| Louisville | USC | USC | ||
| Miami | Miami | Miami | ||
| No. Carolina | USC | USC | ||
| NC State | USC | USC | ||
| Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | ||
| SMU | USC | USC | ||
| Stanford | USC | USC | ||
| Syracuse | USC | USC | ||
| Virginia | USC | USC | ||
| Va. Tech | Va. Tech | Va. Tech | ||
| Wake Forest | USC | USC | ||
| Army | USC | USC | ||
| Charlotte | USC | USC | ||
| Ea. Carolina | USC | USC | ||
| Fl. Atlantic | USC | USC | ||
| Memphis | USC | USC | ||
| Navy | USC | USC | ||
| No. Texas | USC | USC | ||
| Rice | USC | USC | ||
| So. Florida | USC | USC | ||
| Temple | USC | USC | ||
| Tulane | USC | USC | ||
| Tulsa | USC | USC | ||
| UAB | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| UTSA | USC | USC | ||
| Arizona | USC | USC | ||
| Arizona St | USC | USC | ||
| BYU | BYU | BYU | ||
| Baylor | USC | USC | ||
| Cincinnati | USC | USC | ||
| Colorado | USC | USC | ||
| Houston | USC | USC | ||
| Iowa State | USC | USC | ||
| Kansas | USC | USC | ||
| Kansas St | USC | USC | ||
| Oklahoma St | USC | USC | ||
| TCU | USC | USC | ||
| Texas Tech | USC | USC | ||
| UCF | USC | USC | ||
| Utah | USC | USC | ||
| We. Virginia | USC | USC | ||
| Illinois | USC | USC | ||
| Indiana | USC | USC | ||
| Iowa | USC | USC | ||
| Maryland | USC | USC | ||
| Michigan | USC | USC | ||
| Michigan St | USC | USC | ||
| Minnesota | USC | USC | ||
| Nebraska | USC | USC | ||
| Northwestern | USC | USC | ||
| Ohio State | USC | USC | ||
| Oregon | USC | USC | ||
| Penn State | Penn State | Penn State | ||
| Purdue | USC | USC | ||
| Rutgers | USC | USC | ||
| UCLA | UCLA | UCLA | ||
| Washington | USC | USC | ||
| Wisconsin | USC | USC | ||
| Florida Int | USC | USC | ||
| J'ville St | USC | USC | ||
| Kennesaw St | USC | USC | ||
| Liberty | USC | USC | ||
| La. Tech | USC | USC | ||
| Mid. Tenn. | USC | USC | ||
| N. Mexico St | USC | USC | ||
| Sam Houston | USC | USC | ||
| UTEP | USC | USC | ||
| We. Kentucky | USC | USC | ||
| Mass. | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame | ||
| UConn | USC | USC | ||
| Akron | USC | USC | ||
| Ball State | USC | USC | ||
| Bowl'g Green | USC | USC | ||
| Buffalo | USC | USC | ||
| Ce. Michigan | USC | USC | ||
| Ea. Michigan | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Kent St | USC | USC | ||
| Miami (OH) | USC | USC | ||
| No. Illinois | USC | USC | ||
| Ohio | USC | USC | ||
| Toledo | USC | USC | ||
| We. Michigan | USC | USC | ||
| Air Force | USC | USC | ||
| Boise St | USC | USC | ||
| Colorado St | USC | USC | ||
| Fresno St | USC | USC | ||
| Hawai'i | USC | USC | ||
| Nevada | USC | USC | ||
| New Mexico | USC | USC | ||
| San Diego St | USC | USC | ||
| San Jose St | USC | USC | ||
| UNLV | USC | USC | ||
| Utah St | USC | USC | ||
| Wyoming | USC | USC | ||
| Oregon St | USC | USC | ||
| Wash. St | USC | USC | ||
| Alabama | Alabama | Alabama | ||
| Arkansas | USC | USC | ||
| Auburn | USC | USC | ||
| Florida | Florida | Florida | ||
| Georgia | Georgia | Georgia | ||
| Kentucky | USC | USC | ||
| LSU | USC | USC | ||
| Missouri | USC | USC | ||
| Miss. St | Miss. St | Miss. St | ||
| Oklahoma | USC | USC | ||
| Ole Miss | Ole Miss | Ole Miss | ||
| So. Carolina | USC | USC | ||
| Tennessee | USC | USC | ||
| Texas | Texas | Texas | ||
| Texas A&M | USC | USC | ||
| Vanderbilt | USC | USC | ||
| App State | USC | USC | ||
| Arkansas St | USC | USC | ||
| Coastal Car. | USC | USC | ||
| Georgia So. | USC | USC | ||
| Georgia St | USC | USC | ||
| J. Madison | USC | USC | ||
| Louisiana | USC | USC | ||
| Marshall | USC | USC | ||
| Old Dominion | USC | USC | ||
| So. Miss | USC | USC | ||
| So. Alabama | USC | USC | ||
| Texas St. | USC | USC | ||
| Troy | USC | USC | ||
| UL Monroe | USC | USC | ||
| Delaware | USC | USC | ||
| Missouri St | USC | USC |
PowerWise = 121
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 2.93
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
1 H San Jose St ( 2- 1, 81.2) 42-26 -18.74 9.99 -1.00 0.73 13.15
1 H Fresno St ( 1- 1, 81.2) 39- 0 -18.73 10.01 -1.00 0.73 13.18
1 H Louisiana ( 2- 1, 83.5) 49-30 -16.37 12.36 -1.00 0.73 16.62
1 A Rutgers ( 0- 3, 79.6) 42-35 -20.28 8.46 1.00 0.73 13.84
------
56.80
|
winning pts = 56.7955 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------